By year
The top names of 1915
Mary led the girls and John the boys, out of 1,832,427 babies in the public record for that year.
Girls, 1915
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 58,187 | 5.91% |
| 2 | Helen | 30,866 | 3.14% |
| 3 | Dorothy | 25,154 | 2.56% |
| 4 | Margaret | 23,054 | 2.34% |
| 5 | Ruth | 21,878 | 2.22% |
| 6 | Mildred | 15,254 | 1.55% |
| 7 | Anna | 15,119 | 1.54% |
| 8 | Elizabeth | 14,103 | 1.43% |
| 9 | Frances | 12,786 | 1.30% |
| 10 | Evelyn | 11,595 | 1.18% |
| 11 | Marie | 11,363 | 1.15% |
| 12 | Virginia | 10,952 | 1.11% |
| 13 | Alice | 10,525 | 1.07% |
| 14 | Florence | 10,105 | 1.03% |
| 15 | Lillian | 9,546 | 0.97% |
| 16 | Rose | 9,375 | 0.95% |
| 17 | Irene | 8,323 | 0.85% |
| 18 | Louise | 8,313 | 0.84% |
| 19 | Catherine | 8,181 | 0.83% |
| 20 | Edna | 8,144 | 0.83% |
| 21 | Gladys | 7,857 | 0.80% |
| 22 | Josephine | 7,606 | 0.77% |
| 23 | Ethel | 7,379 | 0.75% |
| 24 | Ruby | 7,237 | 0.74% |
| 25 | Martha | 7,216 | 0.73% |
| 26 | Hazel | 7,092 | 0.72% |
| 27 | Grace | 7,044 | 0.72% |
| 28 | Eleanor | 7,036 | 0.72% |
| 29 | Lucille | 7,006 | 0.71% |
| 30 | Thelma | 6,762 | 0.69% |
| 31 | Edith | 6,761 | 0.69% |
| 32 | Pauline | 6,334 | 0.64% |
| 33 | Esther | 6,321 | 0.64% |
| 34 | Doris | 6,292 | 0.64% |
| 35 | Gertrude | 6,077 | 0.62% |
| 36 | Annie | 5,936 | 0.60% |
| 37 | Beatrice | 5,342 | 0.54% |
| 38 | Clara | 5,285 | 0.54% |
| 39 | Marjorie | 5,119 | 0.52% |
| 40 | Emma | 5,044 | 0.51% |
| 41 | Elsie | 4,967 | 0.50% |
| 42 | Bernice | 4,937 | 0.50% |
| 43 | Ann | 4,895 | 0.50% |
| 44 | Julia | 4,831 | 0.49% |
| 45 | Agnes | 4,795 | 0.49% |
| 46 | Bertha | 4,785 | 0.49% |
| 47 | Lois | 4,775 | 0.49% |
| 48 | Jean | 4,603 | 0.47% |
| 49 | Katherine | 4,488 | 0.46% |
| 50 | Marion | 4,456 | 0.45% |
Boys, 1915
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 47,576 | 5.61% |
| 2 | William | 38,563 | 4.54% |
| 3 | James | 33,773 | 3.98% |
| 4 | Robert | 28,737 | 3.39% |
| 5 | Joseph | 23,051 | 2.72% |
| 6 | George | 22,307 | 2.63% |
| 7 | Charles | 21,960 | 2.59% |
| 8 | Edward | 15,889 | 1.87% |
| 9 | Frank | 15,006 | 1.77% |
| 10 | Thomas | 11,490 | 1.35% |
| 11 | Walter | 11,255 | 1.33% |
| 12 | Harold | 10,444 | 1.23% |
| 13 | Paul | 10,328 | 1.22% |
| 14 | Henry | 10,138 | 1.19% |
| 15 | Richard | 9,143 | 1.08% |
| 16 | Raymond | 8,981 | 1.06% |
| 17 | Albert | 8,825 | 1.04% |
| 18 | Arthur | 8,564 | 1.01% |
| 19 | Harry | 8,470 | 1.00% |
| 20 | Donald | 7,116 | 0.84% |
| 21 | Ralph | 6,816 | 0.80% |
| 22 | Carl | 6,613 | 0.78% |
| 23 | Louis | 6,518 | 0.77% |
| 24 | Clarence | 6,267 | 0.74% |
| 25 | Howard | 6,103 | 0.72% |
| 26 | Fred | 5,778 | 0.68% |
| 27 | Jack | 5,749 | 0.68% |
| 28 | Kenneth | 5,681 | 0.67% |
| 29 | Francis | 5,594 | 0.66% |
| 30 | Willie | 5,434 | 0.64% |
| 31 | David | 5,394 | 0.64% |
| 32 | Roy | 5,052 | 0.60% |
| 33 | Earl | 4,908 | 0.58% |
| 34 | Stanley | 4,807 | 0.57% |
| 35 | Ernest | 4,787 | 0.56% |
| 36 | Anthony | 4,722 | 0.56% |
| 37 | Lawrence | 4,688 | 0.55% |
| 38 | Joe | 4,648 | 0.55% |
| 39 | Samuel | 4,351 | 0.51% |
| 40 | Herbert | 4,341 | 0.51% |
| 41 | Eugene | 4,321 | 0.51% |
| 42 | Alfred | 4,231 | 0.50% |
| 43 | Michael | 4,079 | 0.48% |
| 44 | Leonard | 3,993 | 0.47% |
| 45 | Elmer | 3,802 | 0.45% |
| 46 | Andrew | 3,573 | 0.42% |
| 47 | Leo | 3,527 | 0.42% |
| 48 | Bernard | 3,302 | 0.39% |
| 49 | Peter | 3,302 | 0.39% |
| 50 | Norman | 3,262 | 0.38% |
United States national data, Social Security Administration. The file counts Social Security applications, so its early decades undercount; the share column is a name's part of the names recorded for that sex that year, not of all births. How we use it.
Get the free Name Kit
Five printables made in your browser: a name print for the wall, a nursery sign, a tracing sheet, a shortlist sheet and twelve sibling names with the reason for each. Yours in a moment, for one email.
Make the kitThe book is in the works
A printed picture book where your child earns every letter of their own name, page by page. See the preview pages and hear when it is ready.
Preview the book