By year
The top names of 1917
Mary led the girls and John the boys, out of 2,006,749 babies in the public record for that year.
Girls, 1917
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 64,280 | 5.94% |
| 2 | Helen | 34,251 | 3.17% |
| 3 | Dorothy | 28,852 | 2.67% |
| 4 | Margaret | 25,560 | 2.36% |
| 5 | Ruth | 23,568 | 2.18% |
| 6 | Mildred | 16,256 | 1.50% |
| 7 | Anna | 15,160 | 1.40% |
| 8 | Elizabeth | 15,131 | 1.40% |
| 9 | Frances | 14,363 | 1.33% |
| 10 | Virginia | 14,261 | 1.32% |
| 11 | Evelyn | 12,532 | 1.16% |
| 12 | Marie | 11,813 | 1.09% |
| 13 | Alice | 10,990 | 1.02% |
| 14 | Florence | 10,538 | 0.97% |
| 15 | Lillian | 9,843 | 0.91% |
| 16 | Rose | 9,783 | 0.90% |
| 17 | Irene | 9,163 | 0.85% |
| 18 | Catherine | 8,689 | 0.80% |
| 19 | Louise | 8,584 | 0.79% |
| 20 | Edna | 8,422 | 0.78% |
| 21 | Josephine | 8,326 | 0.77% |
| 22 | Martha | 8,261 | 0.76% |
| 23 | Gladys | 8,075 | 0.75% |
| 24 | Ethel | 7,865 | 0.73% |
| 25 | Doris | 7,819 | 0.72% |
| 26 | Eleanor | 7,669 | 0.71% |
| 27 | Ruby | 7,662 | 0.71% |
| 28 | Edith | 7,532 | 0.70% |
| 29 | Lucille | 7,529 | 0.70% |
| 30 | Grace | 7,373 | 0.68% |
| 31 | Hazel | 7,285 | 0.67% |
| 32 | Thelma | 7,245 | 0.67% |
| 33 | Pauline | 6,896 | 0.64% |
| 34 | Betty | 6,639 | 0.61% |
| 35 | Annie | 6,404 | 0.59% |
| 36 | Marjorie | 6,399 | 0.59% |
| 37 | Gertrude | 6,300 | 0.58% |
| 38 | Esther | 6,281 | 0.58% |
| 39 | Beatrice | 5,839 | 0.54% |
| 40 | Jean | 5,692 | 0.53% |
| 41 | Clara | 5,626 | 0.52% |
| 42 | Bernice | 5,546 | 0.51% |
| 43 | Lois | 5,485 | 0.51% |
| 44 | Ann | 5,455 | 0.50% |
| 45 | Marion | 5,371 | 0.50% |
| 46 | Emma | 5,121 | 0.47% |
| 47 | Julia | 5,078 | 0.47% |
| 48 | Agnes | 5,066 | 0.47% |
| 49 | Katherine | 4,956 | 0.46% |
| 50 | Elsie | 4,939 | 0.46% |
Boys, 1917
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 51,852 | 5.60% |
| 2 | William | 42,422 | 4.58% |
| 3 | James | 37,337 | 4.03% |
| 4 | Robert | 35,220 | 3.81% |
| 5 | Joseph | 24,761 | 2.68% |
| 6 | George | 24,196 | 2.61% |
| 7 | Charles | 24,143 | 2.61% |
| 8 | Edward | 17,501 | 1.89% |
| 9 | Frank | 15,768 | 1.70% |
| 10 | Thomas | 12,611 | 1.36% |
| 11 | Walter | 12,582 | 1.36% |
| 12 | Harold | 11,194 | 1.21% |
| 13 | Paul | 11,156 | 1.21% |
| 14 | Richard | 10,914 | 1.18% |
| 15 | Henry | 10,696 | 1.16% |
| 16 | Raymond | 9,956 | 1.08% |
| 17 | Arthur | 9,282 | 1.00% |
| 18 | Albert | 9,157 | 0.99% |
| 19 | Harry | 8,856 | 0.96% |
| 20 | Donald | 8,729 | 0.94% |
| 21 | Ralph | 7,391 | 0.80% |
| 22 | Jack | 6,875 | 0.74% |
| 23 | Louis | 6,771 | 0.73% |
| 24 | Carl | 6,699 | 0.72% |
| 25 | Clarence | 6,587 | 0.71% |
| 26 | Howard | 6,410 | 0.69% |
| 27 | Kenneth | 6,141 | 0.66% |
| 28 | David | 6,099 | 0.66% |
| 29 | Fred | 5,986 | 0.65% |
| 30 | Francis | 5,801 | 0.63% |
| 31 | Willie | 5,751 | 0.62% |
| 32 | Earl | 5,632 | 0.61% |
| 33 | Roy | 5,586 | 0.60% |
| 34 | Stanley | 5,186 | 0.56% |
| 35 | Joe | 5,142 | 0.56% |
| 36 | Lawrence | 5,094 | 0.55% |
| 37 | Ernest | 5,055 | 0.55% |
| 38 | Anthony | 5,027 | 0.54% |
| 39 | Eugene | 4,873 | 0.53% |
| 40 | Herbert | 4,745 | 0.51% |
| 41 | Leonard | 4,694 | 0.51% |
| 42 | Samuel | 4,490 | 0.49% |
| 43 | Alfred | 4,424 | 0.48% |
| 44 | Michael | 4,288 | 0.46% |
| 45 | Elmer | 3,812 | 0.41% |
| 46 | Norman | 3,788 | 0.41% |
| 47 | Leo | 3,779 | 0.41% |
| 48 | Andrew | 3,752 | 0.41% |
| 49 | Bernard | 3,711 | 0.40% |
| 50 | Peter | 3,464 | 0.37% |
United States national data, Social Security Administration. The file counts Social Security applications, so its early decades undercount; the share column is a name's part of the names recorded for that sex that year, not of all births. How we use it.
Get the free Name Kit
Five printables made in your browser: a name print for the wall, a nursery sign, a tracing sheet, a shortlist sheet and twelve sibling names with the reason for each. Yours in a moment, for one email.
Make the kitThe book is in the works
A printed picture book where your child earns every letter of their own name, page by page. See the preview pages and hear when it is ready.
Preview the book