By year
The top names of 1919
Mary led the girls and John the boys, out of 2,110,239 babies in the public record for that year.
Girls, 1919
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 65,836 | 5.83% |
| 2 | Helen | 33,706 | 2.98% |
| 3 | Dorothy | 31,733 | 2.81% |
| 4 | Margaret | 26,238 | 2.32% |
| 5 | Ruth | 24,562 | 2.17% |
| 6 | Mildred | 17,300 | 1.53% |
| 7 | Virginia | 15,636 | 1.38% |
| 8 | Elizabeth | 15,287 | 1.35% |
| 9 | Frances | 15,106 | 1.34% |
| 10 | Anna | 14,498 | 1.28% |
| 11 | Evelyn | 13,321 | 1.18% |
| 12 | Marie | 12,008 | 1.06% |
| 13 | Alice | 11,141 | 0.99% |
| 14 | Florence | 10,482 | 0.93% |
| 15 | Betty | 10,106 | 0.89% |
| 16 | Irene | 9,712 | 0.86% |
| 17 | Lillian | 9,516 | 0.84% |
| 18 | Doris | 9,433 | 0.83% |
| 19 | Rose | 9,195 | 0.81% |
| 20 | Louise | 8,812 | 0.78% |
| 21 | Gladys | 8,717 | 0.77% |
| 22 | Edna | 8,404 | 0.74% |
| 23 | Catherine | 8,335 | 0.74% |
| 24 | Ruby | 8,334 | 0.74% |
| 25 | Martha | 8,322 | 0.74% |
| 26 | Josephine | 8,104 | 0.72% |
| 27 | Lucille | 7,856 | 0.70% |
| 28 | Ethel | 7,809 | 0.69% |
| 29 | Edith | 7,767 | 0.69% |
| 30 | Eleanor | 7,611 | 0.67% |
| 31 | Thelma | 7,558 | 0.67% |
| 32 | Hazel | 7,430 | 0.66% |
| 33 | Marjorie | 7,335 | 0.65% |
| 34 | Grace | 7,195 | 0.64% |
| 35 | Annie | 7,146 | 0.63% |
| 36 | Pauline | 6,973 | 0.62% |
| 37 | Jean | 6,799 | 0.60% |
| 38 | Esther | 6,248 | 0.55% |
| 39 | Gertrude | 6,014 | 0.53% |
| 40 | Lois | 5,976 | 0.53% |
| 41 | Beatrice | 5,856 | 0.52% |
| 42 | Bernice | 5,793 | 0.51% |
| 43 | Clara | 5,404 | 0.48% |
| 44 | Marion | 5,158 | 0.46% |
| 45 | Emma | 5,087 | 0.45% |
| 46 | Sarah | 5,022 | 0.44% |
| 47 | Elsie | 4,995 | 0.44% |
| 48 | Julia | 4,950 | 0.44% |
| 49 | Ann | 4,924 | 0.44% |
| 50 | Agnes | 4,901 | 0.43% |
Boys, 1919
| # | Name | Babies | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 53,522 | 5.46% |
| 2 | William | 43,969 | 4.49% |
| 3 | James | 42,392 | 4.33% |
| 4 | Robert | 41,025 | 4.19% |
| 5 | Charles | 25,192 | 2.57% |
| 6 | George | 25,170 | 2.57% |
| 7 | Joseph | 24,266 | 2.48% |
| 8 | Edward | 18,536 | 1.89% |
| 9 | Frank | 15,701 | 1.60% |
| 10 | Thomas | 13,434 | 1.37% |
| 11 | Walter | 12,879 | 1.31% |
| 12 | Richard | 12,441 | 1.27% |
| 13 | Harold | 12,021 | 1.23% |
| 14 | Raymond | 11,384 | 1.16% |
| 15 | Paul | 11,305 | 1.15% |
| 16 | Henry | 10,613 | 1.08% |
| 17 | Donald | 9,904 | 1.01% |
| 18 | Albert | 9,607 | 0.98% |
| 19 | Arthur | 9,540 | 0.97% |
| 20 | Harry | 8,990 | 0.92% |
| 21 | Jack | 8,263 | 0.84% |
| 22 | Ralph | 7,709 | 0.79% |
| 23 | Willie | 6,942 | 0.71% |
| 24 | Howard | 6,843 | 0.70% |
| 25 | Clarence | 6,825 | 0.70% |
| 26 | Kenneth | 6,796 | 0.69% |
| 27 | David | 6,716 | 0.69% |
| 28 | Louis | 6,661 | 0.68% |
| 29 | Carl | 6,474 | 0.66% |
| 30 | Fred | 6,091 | 0.62% |
| 31 | Earl | 5,975 | 0.61% |
| 32 | Roy | 5,970 | 0.61% |
| 33 | Eugene | 5,892 | 0.60% |
| 34 | Francis | 5,726 | 0.58% |
| 35 | Joe | 5,709 | 0.58% |
| 36 | Ernest | 5,296 | 0.54% |
| 37 | Stanley | 5,238 | 0.53% |
| 38 | Lawrence | 5,205 | 0.53% |
| 39 | Leonard | 5,010 | 0.51% |
| 40 | Herbert | 4,960 | 0.51% |
| 41 | Anthony | 4,737 | 0.48% |
| 42 | Alfred | 4,615 | 0.47% |
| 43 | Samuel | 4,472 | 0.46% |
| 44 | Elmer | 3,982 | 0.41% |
| 45 | Bernard | 3,915 | 0.40% |
| 46 | Michael | 3,909 | 0.40% |
| 47 | Andrew | 3,851 | 0.39% |
| 48 | Norman | 3,809 | 0.39% |
| 49 | Leo | 3,802 | 0.39% |
| 50 | Russell | 3,645 | 0.37% |
United States national data, Social Security Administration. The file counts Social Security applications, so its early decades undercount; the share column is a name's part of the names recorded for that sex that year, not of all births. How we use it.
Get the free Name Kit
Five printables made in your browser: a name print for the wall, a nursery sign, a tracing sheet, a shortlist sheet and twelve sibling names with the reason for each. Yours in a moment, for one email.
Make the kitThe book is in the works
A printed picture book where your child earns every letter of their own name, page by page. See the preview pages and hear when it is ready.
Preview the book